… Pulling of CNS 6 programThe dropping of a live call-in programme by CNS Channel 6 over the weekend has sparked accusations of rights violations with one of the hosts yesterday saying that President Bharrat Jagdeo made the telephone call that led to management making that fateful decision.President Jagdeo was not available for a response.Both Ramon Gaskin and attorney-at-law/columnist, Christopher Ram,
Cheap Stitched Jerseys, hosts of the “Keeping Them Honest” programme,
Cheap Basketball Jerseys, during a press conference at the Pegasus Hotel yesterday, had harsh wEmbattled Christopher Ram (right) with top diplomats. Backing camera is British High Commissioner, Simon Bond; from left is Canadian High Commissioner, Francois Montour; US Charge d'Affaires, Thomas Pierce; and EU Head, Ambassador Geert Heikens.ords for the decision which they said resulted from pressure by the government.The press conference also saw the attendance of senior diplomats from the US, Canada, European Union and Britain; and representatives from the Alliance For Change, the Guyana Bar Association and the Guyana Human Rights Association.After being aired for 15 consecutive weeks on CSN Channel 6 and costing $30,000 on each occasion, on Saturday the programme sparked the station’s Managing Director, C.N. Sharma, to drop a bombshell in a letter to Ram pulling the programme.“I regret to advise you that I can no longer offer you airtime for your broadcast of the …programme. This decision, which takes effect immediately, has been taken for regulatory reasons following a conversation I have had with the relevant authorities concerning the content of the programme.”CNS under PressureSharma made it clear that the decision did not come without pressure. “I thank you most sincerely for choosing the People’s Station CNS6 for your hugely popular and useful program and I trust that you will understand the pressure to which my TV station has been subject to over the past several years and the sensitivity of the authorities in the current politically charged environment.”There were no immediate criticisms of Sharma or his wife, Savitri, on the decisions with both Ram and Gaskin saying that they “understand” the pressures.Recently, following the controversial airing of a programme by government critic, Tony Vieira, the Advisory Committee on Broadcasting (ACB) found CNS Channel 6 guilty of breaching regulations and recommended to President Bharrat Jagdeo that the station be closed for six months.After a meeting with the Sharmas, the President did not enforce the decision and this was likely the “sword of Damocles” that the administration is swinging above the station’s head, both Ram and Gaskin contended.Reading from a prepared statement, Gaskin said that the decision of the “executive authorities to intimidate the Sharmas and TV Channel 6 into closing down the public affairs programme “Keeping Them Honest”… is not only utterly disgraceful and obscene, but that it constitutes a grave violation by the Jagdeo Government of the fundamental right of Guyanese to free expression guaranteed in Article 146 of the Constitution and the several conventions and treaties to which Guyana is a party, including the United Nations Convention on Civil and Political Rights and the Chapultepec Declaration.”ThreatsThis is not the first time that the ruling administration, led by President Jagdeo,
NFL Jerseys From China, has demonstrated complete disregard for this fundamental right and other enshrined constitutional provisions of citizens and the television broadcaster Channel 6, the activist said.“We are concerned that until and unless our society takes appropriate action, the present ruling group of uncultured and partially educated, corrupt politicians, totally unschooled about modern governance, democratic values and constitutional order, will feel emboldened to continue its nefarious ways.”Gaskin noted that while Guyanese may have honestly believed that such practices ended in October 1992, these have now become a norm, with increasing boldness and viciousness.Both Ram and Gaskin believed that the ruling People’s Progressive Party/Civic is desperate not to lose the upcoming general elections.Not coincidental“Nor do we believe that the timing of the intimidation of the Sharmas coincidental. The government and the ruling party know that for them a loss of power would have serious consequences. They are desperate and their actions will become more irrational, if yet understandable. For the wider Guyanese society such action to suppress press freedom is intended to subvert and distort the electoral and democratic process.”According to Gaskin, Guyana finds itself in such a situation, with desperate individuals corrupting the moral and democratic culture of the country.“Fortunately,<a href="http://www.
